Social structure systems and how to better adapt them to individual needs taking note of other texts like Invisible Women and the work of Cordelia FineThe idea that congressive thinking and actions could be productive inclusive and successful than ingressive strategies isn t something I have come across before it shows the impact that these ways of thinking can have on the way we conduct ourselves and how we interact with others I m heartened to read or listen to thanks Netgalley et another nonfiction book on gender that says a woman doesn t necessarily have to act like a man in order to progress in their career and to be respected that a measured approach can work just as well More of a 35 I ll try and write a review when I have of my thoughts together but I do think this is an interesting exploration of gender dynamics and what society needs to succeed as a whole There s a lot of food for thought that I d like others to feast on Using mathematics and specifically Category theory the author explores gender and ineuality It is a really uniue lens to explore this much researched topic and although it gets a bit dry and essay ish it is an interesting thought provokerThanks to the publisher and NetGalley for providing me with an advanced reader copy in exchange for an honest review At first I admit to some scepticism about the idea that we could use mathematics to rethink our conversations around gender I was apprehensive because science and even to some extent mathematics or at least applied subsets of its like statistics have been misused and abused in service of gender stereotype fallacies Indeed Eugenia Cheng points this out herself and this along with her careful and patient exposition of her topic eventually won me over X Forging Gay Identities y A Mathematician s Manifesto for Rethinking Gender is a good example of how an interdisciplinary approach to gender issues can oftenield interesting new ideas Cheng has clearly taken a lot of time to consider how to model and talk about disparities in our society when viewed I love this approach to gender and what a better way to do this than to use one of the all time subject that most women have been put down for Oh how I wish I could buy this book and send it as presents to those teachers who kept telling me that boys are better at math than girlsIt took me a while to read this book because it s not the kind ou read like fiction or a thriller turning page after page but rathe An interesting take on gender disparities in society that attempts to solve the problem by completely sidestepping it gender is correlated with traits that are valued in current society and that society is set up to reward thinking those traits are natural or perfectly related to gender or to skills like math that are valued is a logical mistake and it makes sense to make society euitable for people with different levels of these traits As another reviewer put it Cheng is not arguing that all people are the same with the same abilities but takes issue with the division of character traits into masculine and feminine She proposes instead a spectrum of character using two neologisms ingressive going into things and congressive bringing things together I think Cheng has some work to do to prove that these traits are the important ones and there is a LOT of work to be done to make society value both congressive skills as much as ingressive Cheng sketches out some of these in the last part of the book but I think going into these suggestions could have been a full book by themselves Cheng is very good at explaining mathematical concepts and how they may relate to perceptions of differences between categories The book is also a nice primer on logical thinking On the whole an interesting breezy rea. Ewards traits that it associates with males such as competitiveness we treat the problems those traits can create as male But putting competitive women in charge will leave many unjust relationships in place If we want real change we need to transform the contexts in which we all exist and not simply who we think we ar.
review x + Author Eugenia Cheng
So demeaning and exactly why I m not a feminist and probably this is why this book just isn t for me And this is also the reason why the author has not reframed the way we look at gender It s just the same feminist ideology over and over again Another thing that the author failed to reframe is when she explains mansplaining It is when he does it despite there being clear signs that the woman already knows it and possibly knows it better than he does which fits into pattern that many women experience across their whole lives of society generally assuming that men are knowledgeable than women p126 How about instead of looking at this situation through the lens of oppression but instead see it as an opportunity So a man wants to talk to me but I already know the topic very well In that situation I as the woman have the power to steer the conversation into a direction I m interested in The man signals interest in communicating with me in that instance which I personally find nice and I appreciate it whenever someone else starts a conversation with me What s the big deal Exactly it s notIf Fiche Blian ag Fás you would like a very gentle introduction into intersectional feminism I guess this book is forou Also if Esteem Enlivened by Desire you would like to have a very gentle introduction into higher maths it s also uite good and the author is clearly VERY passionate about her field which is something to admire Her joy in teaching also comes across very nicely Interview with author in NYT book review Music math This book provides a different outlook of gender roles by looking at character traits independently of gender Among other things it shows how character traits are often unfairly and baselessly attached to gender and how statistics can be used to manipulate data to support or oppose a desired point The author therefore encourages readers to separate behaviorcharacter from gender unless when absolutely necessary by instead considering characteristics in the context of being ingressive All about self or congressive collaborative team work Cheng continues by furnishing readers with several real life examples of congressive and ingressive behaviors and strongly nudges readers to embrace congressivity and neutralize ingressivityWhile this book was thought provoking I was rather underwhelmed by the writing style and struggled to read through to the end I often felt like I was reading a research paper and I simply was not engaged However I finished reading with an awareness of the spaces that I occupy in my daily life and the type of behavior and characteristics that are fostered and encouraged there and with a desire to embrace congressivity and neutralize ingressive behavior I appreciated Cheng s use of real life examples throughout this book to which I am sure many people who occupy spaces specifically in academia can relate I do feel that intentionally or not this book euated ingressive to bad and congressive to good without consideration for people who might be naturally ingressive or wayssituations in which ingressive behaviors may be appropriate or even beneficial Still I completed this book with new insight and a lot to contemplate on Yes Yes x infinity to the power of infinity I love how little I needed to know math to understand this book And I loved how it touched very gently but in a relevant way all the subjects that matter The book was written in March 2020 so it s current and important andes can we start doing that right nowOne thing that I wish it would have been addressing is how that proposed theory would work in languages that are extremely gender specific but I guess it can be discussed further in an extended edition later in the process This was a really interesting book that takes a different spin on the male dominated. Deals with context relationships and nuanced versions of euality than with intrinsic characteristics Category theory also emphasizes dimensionality much as a cube can cast a suare or diamond shadow depending on our perspective so too do gender politics appear to change with how we examine them Because society often
This book has an interesting premise but the execution is severely lacking in my opinion So basically the author is an intersectional feminist and this never gets challenged but is spoken of as facts Her idea of reframing is that ou decouple character traits from gender That s it Honestly I don t even think category theory mathematical theory which is interesting and the author explains in a very general sense in this book would have been needed for this point to be made Many people have had this idea before so it s really nothing earth shattering She comes up with the terms ingressive focusing on onself over society and community individualism competitive and adversarial than collaborative p131 and congressive focusing on society and community over self collaborative and cooperative than competitive p131If the author would have been serious about this reframing business she should have stopped talking about gender altogether after the point the introduced these new conceptswords Instead the continuously labels ingressive as BAD and congressive as GOOD and then she likes to remark how mostly men act ingressively while women are mostly congressive And since society is ingressive it favors men She claims her new terminology is ungendered but that s just not true since she constantly goes on and on how ingressive character traits are shown by men In my opinion she reframed nothing just invented two new words To be fair at one point she does mention that anyone in any situation can behave both ingressive and congressive but she is of the opinion that congressive behavior leads to a better world She raises a few good points how science should be collaborative there should be less gatekeeping and all of But again this is nothing new She also doesn t think women should lean in and become ingressive themselves because she thinks it s giving ourself up to the patriarchy or less In my opinion setting boundaries which is something that she approves of is a very healthy and ingressive character trait that I would not want to be giving up She claims that by becoming ingressive ou ultimately just become an oppressor to the weaker ones in the hierarchy I wonder if life is as simple as that Also just because They Shall Be One Flesh you have power doesn t necessarily take away of anyone else s power I highly doubt that life is as simple as a zero sum game I would also like to challenge the author s view on resilience I want to stress that resilience or the appearance of it is much easier for privileged people p197 Is it Doesn t a harder life makeou resilient towards the adversaries that come along the way But I guess this is my problem with many of the intersectionality discussion and the hierarchy of oppression Of course we shouldn t aim to be willfully hurtful towards others or stand in their way but at the same time The Heritage of Arabo-Islamic Learning you can t go through life and never expect to get hurt The authors solution to most of the problems seem to be to just not go there at all And just everyone to be nicer and collaborative Another point that she mentions is Congressive people often get walked on because we re trying so hard not to be horrible people In particular women are pressurized to sacrifice themselves for the good of other people either in their families or in caring professions p200 Okay so what doou think men do Do Hereward (Hereward, you think all men WANT to have a career and be ingressive Most likely not Their sacrifice for their families is different but a sacrifice nonetheless All the men who go out in the summer in the heat and fix the roofs on the houses build the streets collect the trash Their sacrifice may look different but it is done for the community and for their families nonetheless Failing to see this and playing this game of who has it worse is. A brilliant mathematician's new path out of gender ineualityWhy are men in charge Afterears in the male dominated field of mathematics and in the female dominated field of art Eugenia Cheng has heard the uestion many times In x Cheng argues that her mathematical specialty category theory reveals why Category theory.